.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v24i1.919

Keywords:

systematic review, logistics, transportation, supply chain.

Abstract

The literature review is a research key stage in any field of science. The use of the Systematic Literature Review stands out in logistics and transportation, submitting a repeatable and auditable implementation process. However, SLR execution steps are not free from bias and subjectivity of the researcher. In face of these difficulties, this paper proposes the adoption of quality evaluation criteria while conducting the SLR to identify failures and to correct them. To demonstrate the applicability of the proposal, three case studies in logistics and transportation are evaluated. The application identified failures in the execution of SLR and pointed ways to correct them. It is highlighted that the proposed criteria are also useful for assessing the quality of narrative literature review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Casey, P. & Landgraf, G. Literature eeviews: how to put it all together. In Avni, A., Burley, P., Casey, P., Cherney, J., Christiansen, L., Daly, J. S., ... & Yu, H. (2015). Literature searches and literature reviews for transportation research projects. How to Search, Where to Search, and How to Put It All Together: Current Practices. Transportation Research E-Circular (E-C194).

Daly, J. S.; Meier, A.; Winter, K.; Yu, H. Literature searches: how to search. In: Avni, A., Burley, P., Casey, P., Cherney, J., Christiansen, L., Daly, J. S.,& Yu, H. (2015). Literature searches and literature reviews for transportation research projects. How to Search, Where to Search, and How to Put It All Together: Current Practices. Transportation Research E-Circular (E-C194).

De La-Torre-Ugarte-Guanilo, M. C.; R. F. Takahashi e M.R. Bertolozzi (2011). Revisión sistemática: nociones generales. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, v. 45, n. 5.

Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization studies, v. 29, n. 3, p. 393-413. DOI: 10.1177/0170840607088020

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In Buchanan, D. (ed.). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage, p. 671-689.

Fink, A. (2013). Conducting research literature reviews: from the internet to paper. Sage Publications.

Littell, J. H.; J. Corcoran e V. Pillai (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.

Lopes, A. L. M.; Fracolli, L. A. (2008). Revisão sistemática de literatura e metassíntese qualitativa: considerações sobre sua aplicação na pesquisa em enfermagem. Texto contexto - enfermagem, Florianópolis, v. 17, n. 4, p. 771-778. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-07072008000400020

Marconi, M. A. e E. M. Lakatos (2010). Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas.

Noletto, A. P. R. (2014). A embalagem no contexto da logística urbana: uma revisão sistemática. Campinas/SP. Laboratório de Aprendizagem em Logística e Transportes – LALT da Universidade Estadual de Campinas – LALT Unicamp. (Artigo não publicado).

Tarchetti, O. P. (2010). Análise comparativa de processos logísticos no setor de serviços. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo.

Popay, J.; A. Rogers e G. Williams (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services Research. Qualitative Health Research, v. 8, n. 3, p. 341-351. DOI: 10.1177/104973239800800305

Santos Júnior, J. B. S.; O. F. Lima Júnior; A. G. Novaes e B. Scholz-reiter (2011). A comparative analysis of supply network risk management techniques based on systematic literature review. CONGRESSO DE PESQUISA E ENSINO EM TRANSPORTES, 25, 2011. Anais... Belo Horizonte/MG: ANPET.

Santos, L. S.; S. A. Loureiro; O. F. Lima Júnior; B.V. Bertoncini e O. B. Bezerra (2014). Análise da literatura de geografia do tempo aplicada ao transporte urbano de cargas. CONGRESSO DE PESQUISA E ENSINO EM TRANSPORTES, 28, 2014. Anais… Curitiba/PR: ANPET.

Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., ... & Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC medical research methodology, v. 7, n. 1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10

Soni, G. e R. Kodali (2011). A critical analysis of supply chain management content in empirical Research. Business Process Management Journal, v. 17, n. 2, p. 238-266. DOI: 10.1108/14637151111122338

Tranfield, D.; D. Denyer e P. Smart (2003). Toward a methodology for developing evidence informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, n. 14, p.207-222. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Urra Medina, E e R. M. Barria Pailaquilen (2010). A revisão sistemática e a sua relação com a prática baseada na evidência em saúde. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, v. 18, n. 4, Aug.

Van Wee, B., & Banister, D. (2015). How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transport Reviews, (ahead-of-print), 1-11. DOI:10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456

Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-11

How to Cite

Loureiro, S. A., Noletto, A. P. R., da Silva Santos, L., Silva Santos Júnior, J. B., & Fontes Lima Júnior, O. (2016). Transportes, 24(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v24i1.919

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
  2. Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal, and to be adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given and any derivative works are distributed under the same terms.
  3. Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
  5. Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
  6. Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.