Avaliação dos impactos do metrô na acessibilidade da população de baixa renda aos postos de trabalho em Fortaleza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i3.2022Keywords:
Evaluation of public policies in urban transport, Accessibility planning, Public transportation.Abstract
The current transportation planning paradigm, which focus lies not only on people’s mobility but specially on their access to urban activities, is based on sustainability and equity principles aiming to reduce socio-spatial inequalities, thus fostering better quality of life and social justice. In such a decision-making context, this paper’s main objective is to assess how operational investments in Metrofor’s South and West lines impact on the accessibility to jobs experienced by the low-income population in Fortaleza. The proposed ex-ante assessment method, assuming the egalitarianism social premise, uses a utility-based accessibility indicator, derived from the logsum concept, to help raise hypotheses related to the zones’ spatial distribution more or less benefited from the intervention, as well as the dispersion of the impact over the most vulnerable social group. It is concluded that the proposed actions are effective in raising accessibility levels in critical zones, although with limited effects if not coupled with land-use public policies.Downloads
References
Andrade, B. R. (2016). Compreensão da Problemática da Periferização por Segregação Involuntária no Planejamento da Acessibilidade Mobilidade em Fortaleza. Dissertação de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Transportes, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE.
Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Ben-Akiva, M. E., Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1st ed.). Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
de Jong, G., Pieters, M., Daly, A., Graafland-Essers, I., Kroes, E., Koopmans, C. (2005). Using the Logsum as an Evaluation Measure (Working Papers No. WR-275-AVV). DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002
Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L., Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibil-ity. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(2), 163–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002
Garcia, S. H. F. G., Macário, M. R. M. R., Menezes, E. D. A. G., Loureiro, C. F. G. (2018). Strategic Assessment of Lisbon's Accessibil-ity and Mobility from a Equity Perspective. Networks and Spatial Economics, DOI: s11067-018-9391-4.
Geurs, K. T., van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
Golub, A., Martens, K. (2014). Using principles of justice to assess the modal equity of regional transportation plans. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 10–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.014
Hansen, W. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2) 73-76. DOI: 10.1080/01944365908978307
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2010). Censo Demográfico. Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
Kenworthy, J. (2007). Urban planning and transport paradigm shifts for cities of the post-petroleum age. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(2), 47–70. DOI: 10.1080/10630730701531708
Kohli, S., Daly, A. (2006). The use of logsums in welfare estimation: application in PRISM. ©Association for European Transport and Contributors, 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1442890
Lima, L. S. (2017). Espraiamento urbano por autossegregação e seus impactos na acessibilidade urbana de Fortaleza. Dissertação de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Transportes, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE.
Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
Lucas, K., van Wee, B., Maat, K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessi-bility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3), 473–490. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9585-2
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillian and Co.
Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (2015). Programa de Disseminação das Estatísticas do Trabalho. Relação Anual de In-formações Sociais (RAIS). Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego. Brasília, DF.
Menezes, E. D. A. G. (2015). Metodologia para avaliação estratégica da problemática da acessibilidade urbana sob o princípio da equidade. Dissertação de Mestrado. Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Transportes, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE.
Meyer, L. H., Roser, D. (2009). Enough for the Future. In A. Gosseries & L. H. Meyer (Eds.), Intergenerational Justice (pp. 219–248). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.001.0001
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2009). The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane & Harvard University Press.
Small, K. A., Verhoef, E. T. (2007). The Economics of Urban Transportation. London: Routledge, T&F Gorup. DOI: 10.4324/9780203642306
Thomopoulos, N., Grant-Muller, S., Tight, M. (2009). Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evalua-tion: current practice and a proposed methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(4), 351–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.013
van Wee, B. (2016). Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018
van Wee, B., Geurs, K. T. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in acessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4), 350–367. DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2011.11.4.2940
Wachs, M., Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437–456. DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(73)90041-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.
- Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.
