Caracterização da acessibilidade aos empregos percebida pelos usuários do sistema metroferroviário da região metropolitana de Fortaleza
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v28i1.1836Keywords:
Accessibility, Choice, Logsum, Indicator, Description.Abstract
The paradigm shift towards transport planning focused on accessibility, together with the criticism on traditional techniques for ex-ante assessment, opened up new approaches for quantifying direct and indirect impacts of alternative solutions, by the use of accessibility measures based on the concept of users’ perceived utility. In such a context, this work aims to characterize the benefits of implementing the metro system in enhancing the access conditions to jobs for the low-income population in Fortaleza’s Metropolitan Region (RMF), through the proposition of a method based on modeling travel time and on a logsum-type indicator which incorporates users’ perception of its specific problem setting. Its main methodological contribution is the use of behavioral modeling in the analytical effort of better understanding accessibility problems. Moreover, the method application allowed to spatially characterize the accessibility gains of Metrofor’s South and West lines, highlighting the main factors, according to the system’s users perception, which could explain the variation of its benefits over the RMF.Downloads
References
ARCE e Concremat (2013) Atualização da base de dados georreferenciados do STIP-CE. Agência Reguladora dos Serviços Publicos do Estado do Ceará. Fortaleza, CE.
ASTEF (2006) Pesquisa de identificação dos usuários da alternativa de implantação dos trechos Vila das Flores / Couto Fernandes e Couto Fernandes / João Felipe - Linha Sul do Metrofor. Fortaleza, CE.
Banister, D. (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15, 73–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
Bhat, C., Handy, S., Kockelman, K., Mahmassani, H., Chen, Q., e Weston, L. (2000) Urban Accessibility Index: Literature Review. Texas Department of Transportation, University of Texas, Austin.
Börjesson, M., Jonsson, R.D., Berglund, S., e Almström, P. (2014) Land-use impacts in transport appraisal. Res. Transp. Econ. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.021.
Cascetta, E. (2009) Transportation systems analysis: models and applications. (2a.). Springer, New York.
Cascetta, E., Cartenì, A., e Montanino, M. (2013). A new measure of accessibility based on perceived opportunities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 87, 117–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.598
Cavalcante, R. A. (2002) Estimativa das penalidades associadas com os transbordos em sistemas de integrados de transporte público. Dissertação. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, COPPE.
Garcia, C. S. H. F., Macário, M. R. M. R., Menezes, E. D. A. G., e Loureiro, C. F. G. (2018) Strategic Assessment of Lisbon’s Accessibi-lity and Mobility Problems from an Equity Perspective. Networks and Spatial Economics, 1–25. DOI: 10.1007/s11067-018-9391-4.
Geurs, K. T., De Montis, A., e Reggiani, A. (2014) Recent advances and applications in acessibility modelling. Computers, Envi-ronmenjt and Urban Systems, n. 49, p. 82–85.
Geurs, K.T., e van Wee, B., (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research direc-tions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12, 127–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Geurs, K. T., Zondag, B., de Jong, G., e de Bok, M. (2010) Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 15(7), 382–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
Handy, S. (2005) Planning for accessibility: in theory and in practice. Access to destinations. 131–147, Elsevier Ltd.
Handy, S. L., e Niemeier, D. A. (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Plan-ning A, 29, 1175–1194. DOI: 10.1068/a291175
Hansen, W. G. (1959) How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Planning Association, v. 25, n. 2, p. 73–76.
Jong, G., Daly, A., Pieters, M., e van der Hoorn, T. (2007) The logsum as an evaluation measure: Review of the literature and new results. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41, 874–889. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.10.002
Jong, G., Pieters, M., Daly, A., Graafland-Essers, I., Kroes, E., e Koopmans, C. (2005) Using the logsum as an evaluation measure: literature and case study. Santa Monica: Calif.: RAND Corporation.
Koenig, J. G. (1980) Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application. Transportation (Amst), v. 9, n. 2, p. 145–172. DOI: 10.1007/BF00167128.
Lopes, A. S., Loureiro, C. F. G., e Van Wee, B. (2018) LUTI operational models review based on the proposition of an a priori ALUTI conceptual model. Transport Reviews, p. 1–22. DOI:10.1080/01441647.2018.1442890.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., e Swait, J. D. (2010) Stated choice mehods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press.
Miller, E. J. (2018) Accessibility : measurement and application in transportation planning. Journal Transport Reviews, v. 38, n. 5., p. 551–555. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1492778.
Niemeier, D. A. (1997) Accessibility: An evaluation using consumer welfare. Transportation (Amst), v. 24, n. 4, p. 377–396. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004914803019.
Santos, C. C. (2012) O Valor do Tempo na Avaliação de Projetos de Transportes. Dissertação. Universidade Federal do Rio Gran-de do Sul.
Small, K. A., e Rosen, H. S. (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica, 49(1), 105–130. DOI: 10.2307/1911129.
Soares, F. D. P., Loureiro, C. F. G., e Miller, E. J. (2018) Diagnosis: A Problem-Oriented Approach to Urban Transportation Planning.
Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting. Washington DC.
Souza, H. H. H. de, e Loureiro, C. F. G. (2018) Proposta de construção de indicador de caracterização da acessibilidade na região metropolitana de Fortaleza. Transportes, p. 129-143. DOI: 10.14295/transportes.v26i4.1546.
Train, K. E. (2009) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2a ed. Cambridge University Press.
van Wee, B. (2016) Accessible accessibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 51, p. 9–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.
- Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.
