Tomada colaborativa de decisão com utilização de teoria dos jogos para o sequenciamento de decolagens em aeroportos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v23i1.828Keywords:
airport, air traffic management, game theory, collaborative decision making.Abstract
Currently in Brazil the decisions in aircraft departure management depend exclusively on the controller’s expertise, which empirically decides the departure sequence scheduling. This work describes the implementation of a Collaborative Departure Management system in airports (CoDMAN) through the concept of Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) with the application of Game Theory. In this model, each agent represents an aircraft that impacts the airport scenario and their decisions are based on the negotiation in dynamic multiagent scenarios in order to yield efficient departure sequences. A prototype was developed with the simulations using flight plans valid to the International Airport of Brasília. The interface with radar systems was also simulated through the evaluation of the impacting flights in TMA-Brasilia during in February 2013 with satisfactory results. The departure sequencing optimization reduced the cost associated to the delays up to 28%, which demonstrates the efficacy of the developed model.Downloads
References
A. M. F. Crespo. Módulo de avaliação e apoio à decisão: uma aplicação de aprendizagem por reforço no gerenciamento tático do fluxo de tráfego aéreo. Master’s thesis, University of Brasília – Science of Computation Department, 2010.
M. Groppe, R. Paglieri, and D. Harris. Field observations during Airport-CDM turn-round process: Study on airline’s approach to TOBT assignment. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, 2010.
Comando da Aeronáutica. Demanda Detalhada dos Aeroportos Brasileiros, volume 1. Brazilian Institute of Civil Aviation, 2005.
M. Yildiz. Nash meets Rubinstein in final-offer arbitration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Economics Department, November 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.10.020
A. C. Arruda Jr. Aprendizagem por reforço aplicada à análise de impacto no controle de fluxo de tráfego aéreo. Master’s thesis, University of Brasília – Science of Computation Department, 2009.
C. A. Holt and A. E. Roth. The Nash equilibrium: A perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 101(12): 3999 – 4002, 2004. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.
L. Weigang, B.B. Souza, A.M.F. Crespo, and D.P. Alves. Deci-sion support system in tactical air traffic flow management for air traffic flow controllers. Journal of Air Transport Management, 14(6):329 – 336, 2008.
International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual on Simultane-ous Operations on Parallel or Near-Parallel Instrument Runways (SOIR). International Civil Aviation Organization, 1 edition, 2004.
D. Bertsimas and S. Gupta. Fairness in air traffic flow manage-ment. INFORMS Meeting, San Diego - CA, USA, 2009.
V. F. Ribeiro. Decisão colaborativa com utilização de Teoria dos Jogos para o sequenciamento de partidas em aeroportos. Mas-ter’s thesis, University of Brasília – Science of Computation Department, 2013.
EUROCONTROL. Airport CDM Implementation - The Manual for Collaborative Decision Making. Eurocontrol, 2010.
T. L. Turocy and B. von Stengel. Game Theory. Number 5. Computational, Discrete and Applicable Mathematics, 2001. CDAM Research Report LSECDAM-2001-09.
A. L. Manocchio. Teoria dos jogos e negociação. Undergraduate thesis, Mathematics Applied to Business Course, University of São Paulo, 2007.
T. Vossen, M. Ball. Optimization and mediated bartering models for ground delay programs. Naval Research Logistics 53 (1), 75–90, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/nav.20123
M. Ball, R. Hoffman, D. Knorr, J. Wetherly, and M. Wambsganss. Assessing the benefits of collaborative decision making in air traffic flow management. 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, April 2000.
DECEA. Implementação Operacional do Conceito de Navegação Baseada em Performance (PBN) no Espaço Aéreo Brasileiro. Circular de Informação Aeronáutica 24/13. 12/12/2013.
R. Goldman. A-CDM in New York KJFK Runway Construction and Impact on Operations. In Advanced ATM Techniques Sym-posium and Workshops, 4 – 6 November 2013, ICAO Headquar-ters, Montréal.
N. J. Ashford, S. Mumayiz and P. H. Wright. Airport Engineer-ing: Planning, Design and Development of 21st Century Airports. 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2011. DOI: 10.1002/9780470950074
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.
- Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.
