Elementos estratégicos de políticas públicas sustentáveis capazes de transformar a mobilidade das cidades brasileiras

Authors

  • Isabel Amorim Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) e Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGEC da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4176-570X
  • Enilson Santos Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN / Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGEC da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE
  • Leonardo Herszon Meira Programa de Pós Graduação em Engenharia Civil - PPGEC da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i3.2029

Keywords:

Mobility policy and plans, Sustainable development, Transformative potential

Abstract

This paper proposes and validates strategic elements of public policies, capable of attributing to local plans the potential of transforming urban mobility. An initial relationship was based on the awards reasons of cities recognized as examples of sustainable urban mobility; these reasons were used to construct a list of thirteen strategic elements, under the lights of Federal Law 12,587/2012. This relationship was validated in two stages: initially, based on a review of dimensions and indicators of sustainable urban mobility; afterwards, through an opinion survey of 26 experts treated by three methods: distribution of points, ranking and discrimination of weights by ranking. Validated, the list reveals six groups of importance, the two most relevant consisting of the elements: priority and qualification of active transportation and public transportation; permanent social participation; and linkage to the urban development plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso, A.; A. Monzón e R. Cascajo (2015) Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, 48: 578–592. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022.

Bajdor, P. e J. Grabara (2013) The transport infrastructure investment’s impact on the level of sustainable transport indicators in the Czestochowa city. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 309: 316-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.309.316.

Banister, D. (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2): 73–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.

BRASIL (2012) Lei nº 12.587, de 3 de janeiro de 2012.

BRASIL (2015) PLANMOB – Caderno de Referência para Elaboração de Plano de Mobilidade Urbana. Ministério das Cidades, Brasília.

BRASIL (2016) Indicadores de Efetividade da Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana. Ministério das Cidades, Brasília.

BRASIL (2018) Lei nº 13.683, de 19 de junho de 2018.

BRASIL (2019) Levantamento sobre a Situação dos Planos de Mobilidade Urbana nos Municípios Brasileiros. Disponível em www.cidades.gov.br/component/content/article?id=4398. Acesso em: 30 de julho de 2019. Ministério do Desenvolvimento Regional, Brasília.

Buzasi, A. e M. Csete (2015) Sustainability indicators in assessing urban transport systems. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 43(3): 138-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.7825.

Campos, V.; R. Ramos e D. Correia (2010) Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 43(4): 371-390. DOI: 10.1002/atr.5670430403.

Castillo, H. e D. Pitfield (2010) ELASTIC – A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators. Transportation Research Part D, 15(4): 179–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002.

Cervero, R. (1998) The Transit Metropolis: a Global Inquiry. Island Press, Washington, DC.

CIVITAS (2013). Application form – category ii: public participation – Municipality of Reggio Emilia. CIVITAS.

CIVITAS (2015). Three cheers to this year's top winning CIVITAS cities. CIVITAS Forum.

CIVITAS (2017). Europe’s pioneering cities for sustainable urban mobility. CIVITAS Forum.

Copenhagen (2014) Copenhagen - European Green Capital 2014: a Review. Sharing Copenhagen.

Cunha, C. (2018) Avaliação de políticas públicas e programas governamentais: tendências recentes e experiências no Brasil. Revista Estudos de Planejamento, 12 (Planejamento e Gestão em Perspectiva): 27-57.

Eisenhammerová, M. (2016) Sustainable transport indicators. Electronical Technical Journal of Technology, Engineering and Logistics in Transport, XI(4): 13-22.

ELTISplus (2012) The State-of-the-Art of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in Europe (Report prepared by Rupprecht Consult and Edinburgh Napier University). ELTISplus/European Comission, Bruxelas.

Eurocities (2017) Best Practice Guide. European Mobility Week 2017. European Secretariat, Bruxelas.

European Commission (1992) Green Paper on the Impact of Transport on the Environment. A Community Strategy for “Sustainable Mobility”. European Union Commission, Bruxelas.

European Commission (2014) Bremen 2014 SUMP Award: Finalist Factsheet. European Commission, Bruxelas.

European Union (2016) Green Cities - Fit for Life. European Union, Bruxelas.

European Union (2017) Ten Section Report on the “Smart Cities” Project. European Union, Bruxelas.

Frey, K (2000) Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, n. 21: 211-259.

Galanis, A. e N. Eliou (2011) Evaluation of the pedestrian infrastructure using walkability indicators. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 12(7): 385-394.

Gillis, D.; I. Semanjski e D. Lauwers (2016) How to monitor sustainable mobility in cities? Literature review in the frame of creating a set of sustainable mobility indicators. Sustainability, 8(1): paper 29 (30 p.). DOI: 10.3390/su8010029.

Haghshenas, H. e M. Vaziri (2012) Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecological Indicators, 15(1): 115–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.010.

Henning, T.; S. Muruvan; W. Feng e R. Dunn (2011) The development of a benchmarking tool for monitoring progress towards sustainable transportation in New Zealand. Transport Policy, 18(12): 480–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.012.

Holanda, N. (2003) Avaliação de políticas públicas: conceitos básicos, o caso do ProInfo e a experiência brasileira. Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública. Panamá.

Holden, E.; K. Linnerud e D. Banister (2013) Sustainable passenger transport: Back to Brundtland. Transportation Research Part A, 54: 67–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.012.

Jakimavičius, M. e M. Burinskiene (2009) A GIS and multi‐criteria‐based analysis and ranking of transportation zones of Vilnius City. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(1): 39-48. DOI: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.39-48.

Jiang, T.; Z. Wu; Y. Song; X. Liu; H. Liu e H. Zhang (2013) Sustainable Transport Data Collection and Application: China Urban Transport Database. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013: paper 879752 (10 p.). DOI: 10.1155/2013/879752.

Klinger, T.; J. Kenworthy e M. Lanzendorf (2013) Dimensions of urban mobility cultures – a comparison of German cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 31: 18–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.002.

Litman, T. (2007) Well Measured developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transportation Research Record, 2017(1): 10–15. DOI: 10.3141/2017-02.

Magalhães, I.; L. Rabay; M. L. Maia e E. Santos (2017) Dimensões e medidas atribuídas ao transporte sustentável: de Brundtland a Banister. Anais do XXXI Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes, ANPET, Recife.

Mansourianfar, M. e H. Haghshenas (2018) Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: Case study of Azadi district. Isfahan, Iran. Cities, 72A: 149–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.012

Marletto, G. e F. Mameli (2012) A participative procedure to select indicators of policies for sustainable urban mobility. Outcomes of a national test. European Transport Research Review, 4(2): 79–89. DOI: 10.1007/s12544-012-0075-8.

Meira, L. (2013) Políticas Públicas de Mobilidade Sustentável no Brasil: Barreiras e Desafios. Tese de Doutorado, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife.

Miranda, H. e A. N. Silva (2012) Benchmarking sustainable urban mobility: The case of Curitiba, Brazil. Transport Policy, 21: 141–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.03.009.

Nantes Métropole (2013) Nantes European Green Capital 2013. Nantes Métropole.

Nguyen, D. e N. Coowanitwong (2011) Strategic environmental assessment application for sustainable transport-related air quality policies: a case study in Hanoi City, Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 13(3): 565–585. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-010-9277-1.

Nicolas, J.; P. Pochet e H. Poimboeuf (2003) Towards sustainable mobility indicators: Application to the Lyons Conurbation. Transport Policy, 10 (3): 197-208. DOI: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00021-0.

Omrani, H.; A. Awasthi; L. Ion L e P. Trigano (2009) A hybrid approach for evaluating environmental impacts for urban transportation mode sharing. Journal of Decision Systems, 18(2): 185-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/jds.18.185-201.

Portugal, L. e A. Mello (2017) Um panorama inicial sobre transporte, mobilidade, acessibilidade e desenvolvimento urbano. In: Portugal, L. (org.) Transporte, Mobilidade e Desenvolvimento Urbano. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro, p. 1-17.

Reisi, M.; L. Aye; A. Rajabifard e T. Ngo (2014) Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecological Indicators, 43: 288–296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.004.

Roszkowska, E. (2013) Rank ordering criteria weighting methods – a comparative overview. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 5(65): 14-33. DOI: 10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02.

Rubim, B. e S. Leitão (2013) O plano de mobilidade urbana e o futuro das cidades. Estudos Avançados, 27(79): 55-66.

Santos, A. e S. Ribeiro (2013) The use of sustainability indicators in urban passenger transport during the decision-making process: the case of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, 5(2): 251–260. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.010.

Santos, A. e S. Ribeiro (2015) The role of transport indicators to the improvement of local governance in Rio de Janeiro City: A contribution for the debate on sustainable future. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(4): 415–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2015.08.006.

Santos, E. e I. Magalhães (2016) Proposição de um método de avaliação de conformidade dos planos municipais de mobilidade urbana com a Lei 12.587/2012. Anais do XXX Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes, ANPET, Rio de Janeiro.

Shiau, T. e J. Liu (2013) Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies. Ecological Indicators, 34: 361– 371. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.001.

Sioui, L. e C. Morency (2012) De la légitimité du transport en commun au Québec: un exemple simple de mesure de ses contributions au développement durable. Recherche Transport Securité, 28(2): 119-138. DOI: 10.1007/s13547-012-0033-9.

Smith, T.; C. Axon e R. Darton (2013) A methodology for measuring the sustainability of car transport systems. Transport Policy, 30: 308–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.019.

Stillwell, W.; D. Seaver e W. Edwards (1981) A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28: 62-77.

Teixeira, E. (2002) O papel das políticas públicas no desenvolvimento local e na transformação da realidade. Associação dos Advogados de Trabalhadores Rurais da Bahia, Salvador.

Tóth-Szabó, Z. e A. Várhelyi (2012) Indicator framework for measuring sustainability of transport in the city. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48: 2035-2047. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1177.

United Nations (2016) Mobilizing Sustainable Transport for Development. Analysis and Policy Recommendations from the United Nations Secretary-General's High-Level Advisory Group on Sustainable Transport. Nova York.

Verma, A.; T. Rahul e M. Dixit (2014) Sustainability impact assessment of transportation policies – A case study for Bangalore city. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(3), 321–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2014.06.001.

WCED (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Zito, P. e G. Salvo (2011) Toward an urban transport sustainability index: an European comparison. European Transport Research Review, 3(4): 179–195. DOI: 10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-13

How to Cite

Amorim, I., Santos, E., & Meira, L. H. (2019). Elementos estratégicos de políticas públicas sustentáveis capazes de transformar a mobilidade das cidades brasileiras. TRANSPORTES, 27(3), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v27i3.2029

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2019): Prêmio ANPET Produção Científica 2018

Section

Artigos Vencedores do Prêmio ANPET Produção Científica

License

Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant TRANSPORTES the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of this journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in TRANSPORTES.

  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after publication of the article. Authors are encouraged to use links to TRANSPORTES (e.g., DOIs or direct links) when posting the article online, as TRANSPORTES is freely available to all readers.

  4. Authors have secured all necessary clearances and written permissions to published the work and grant copyright under the terms of this agreement. Furthermore, the authors assume full responsibility for any copyright infringements related to the article, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding copyright infringement.

  5. Authors assume full responsibility for the contents of the article submitted for review, including all necessary clearances for divulgation of data and results, exonerating ANPET and TRANSPORTES of any responsibility regarding to this aspect.