Representação do fenômeno urbano por meio de modelos integrados dos transportes e uso do solo: revisão da literatura e discussão conceitual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1319Keywords:
LUTI modelling, Integrated Planning, Aggregation Level, Randomness, Dinamicity.Abstract
This paper’s main objective is to evaluate the capability of integrated land-use transport (LUTI) operational models to represent the urban phenomenon, as an initial step towards expanding the role of modeling in the urban planning process. Currently, the application of these tools is focused only on the final stage of planning, in the evaluation of alternatives, but they can also be applied in its strategic stages aiming to understand the problems. Eight LUTI models representing the categories of spatial interaction, econometric, and microsimulation models were assessed for their ability to represent the inner and interrelations of the transport, land-use and activity sub-systems, considering their level of aggregation, randomness, and dynamics of the modeled decisions. It was found that the conceptual bases of the selected models need to be better explicit to make their assumptions and limitations clearer to actors, planners, and modelers, turning not only their results, but also their construction process, especially the calibration and validation efforts, into useful tools for a better understanding of complex urban problems.Downloads
References
Acheampong, R. A., e E. Silva (2015) Land use – transport interaction modeling : A review of the literature and future re-search directions. Journal of Transport and Land use, v. 8, n. 3, p. 11–38. DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.2015.806
Barra, T. de la. (1989) Integrated land use and transport modelling: Decision chains and hierarchies. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
Batty, M. (1994) A chronicle of scientific planning - The Anglo-American modelling experience. Journal of the American Plan-ning Association, v. 60, n. 1, p. 7–16. DOI: 10.1080/01944369408975546
Berechman, J. K. A. Small (1988) Research policy and review 25. Modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas. Environment and Planning A, v. 20, n. 10, p. 1285–1309. DOI: 10.1068/a201285
Brömmelstroet, M. Te e L. Bertolini (2011) The Role of Transport‐Related Models in Urban Planning Practice. Transport Reviews, v. 31, n. 2, p. 139–143. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.541295
Brömmelstroet, M. Te; Bertolini, L.; Gudmundsson, H.; Wegener, M.; Curtis, C.; Timmermans, H. J. P.; Arentze, T. A.; Waddell, P. A.; Naess, P.; Jonsson, D.; Berglund, S.; Almström, P.; Algers, S. e P. C. Pfaffenbichler (2013) Transport Models in Urban Planning Practices: Tensions and Opportunities in a Changing Planning Context. Routledge.
Cascetta, E. (2009) Transportation Systems Analysis. (2ª ed.). Springer US, Boston, MA. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2
Domencich, T. A. e D. McFadden (1975) Urban Travel Demand: A behavioral analysis. (1ª ed.). North-Holland Publishing, New York, USA.
Forrester, J. W. (1999) Urban Dynamics. (2ª ed.). Pegasus Communication, Inc., Williston.
Gudmundsson, H. (2011) Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning. Transport Reviews, v. 31, n. 2, p. 145–159. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.532884
Hunt, J. D., Kriger, D. S. e E. J. Miller (2005) Current operational urban land‐use–transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews, v. 25, n. 3, p. 329–376. DOI: 10.1080/0144164052000336470
Iacono, M., Levinson, D. M., e A. M. El-Geneidy (2008) Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territo-ry. Journal of Planning Literature, v. 22, n. 4, p. 323–340. DOI: 10.1177/0885412207314010
Kii, M. e K. Doi (2005) Multiagent land-use and transport model for the policy evaluation of a compact city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, v. 32, n. 4, p. 485–504. DOI: 10.1068/b3081
Lopes, A. S. (2015) Transportes, Uso do Solo e Atividades - Modelagem conceitual para o planejamento da acessibilidade urbana. Tese em Engenharia de Transportes. Universidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza.
Lowry, I. S. (1964) A model of metropolis. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California, p. 1–150.
Mackett, R. L. (1983) The Leeds Integrated Land-Use Transport Model (LILT). Crowthorne.
Martínez, F. J. (1996) MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City. Transportation Research Record, v. 1552, n. 1, p. 126–134. DOI: 10.3141/1552-18
Meyer, M. D. e E. J. Miller (2001) Urban Transportation Planning: A Decision-Oriented Aprroach. (2ª ed.). McGraw-Hill, Incorpo-rated, New York, USA.
Miller, E. J. (2003) Microssimulation. In: K. G. Goulias, Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton.
Moeckel, R., Schwarze, B., Spiekermann, K. e M. Wegener (2007) Simulating Interactions Between Land Use, Transport And Environment. 11th World Conference on Transport Research. p. 20. Berkeley.
Pereira, A. e S. Quintana (2002) From technocratic to participatory decision support systems: responding to the new gov-ernance initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, v. 6, n. 2, p. 95–107.
Pfaffenbichler, P. C. (2003) The strategic, dynamic and integrated urban land use and transport model MARS (Metropolitan Activi-ty Relocation Simulator). Technischen Universität Wien.
Putman, S. H. (1991) DRAM/EMPAL ITLUP Integrated Transportation Land-Use Activity Allocation Models: General Description. S. H. Putman Associates, Philadelfia.
Ševčíková, H., Raftery, A. E. e P. A. Waddell (2007) Assessing uncertainty in urban simulations using Bayesian melding. Trans-portation Research Part B: Methodological, v. 41, n. 6, p. 652–669. DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2006.11.001
Simmonds, D. C. (1999) The design of the DELTA land-use modelling package. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, v. 26, n. 5, p. 665–684. DOI: 10.1068/b260665
Soares, F. D. P. (2014) Proposta metodológica de compreensão da problemática das relações entre uso do solo e transportes no planejamento urbano integrado. Dissertação em Engenharia de Transportes. Universidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza.
Southworth, F. (1995) A Technical Review of Urban Land Use Transportation Models as Tools for Evaluating Vehicle Travel Reduction Strategies. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Swanson, J., e S. Gleave (2008) Transport and the Urban Economy: The Urban Dynamic Model. Real Corp 008, p. 28–32.
Timmermans, H. J. P. (2003) The saga of integrated land use-transport modeling: how many more dreams before we wake up? 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, p. 10–15. Lucerne.
Timmermans, H. J. P. e T. A. Arentze (2011) Transport Models and Urban Planning Practice: Experiences with Albatross. Transport Reviews, v. 31, n. 2, p. 199–207. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.518292
Waddell, P. A. (2002) UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, v. 68, n. 3, p. 297–314. DOI: 10.1080/01944360208976274
Waddell, P. A. (2011) Integrated Land Use and Transportation Planning and Modelling: Addressing Challenges in Research and Practice. Transport Reviews, v. 31, n. 2, p. 209–229, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.525671
Wegener, M. (1994) Operational Urban Models State of the Art. Journal of the American Planning Association, v. 60, n. 1, p. 17–29. DOI: 10.1080/01944369408975547
Wegener, M. (1995) Current and Future Land Use Models. Land Use Model Conference. Dallas, p. 19–21.
Wegener, M. (2004) Overview of Land Use Transport Models. In: D. A. Hensher, K. J. e K. Button, K. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems (Handbooks in Transport). Pergamon / Elsevier Science, Kidlington, UK, v. 5, p. 127-146. DOI: 10.1108/9781615832538-009
Wegener, M. (2011a) The IRPUD Model. Dortmund.
Wegener, M. (2011b) From Macro to Micro – How Much Micro is too Much? Transport Reviews, v. 31, n. 2, p. 161–177. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2010.532883
Wegener, M., Gnad, F. e M. Vannahme (1986) The time scale of urban change. In: B. Hutchinson e M. Batty (Eds), Advances in Urban Systems Modelling. Amsterdam.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers for publication by TRANSPORTES agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright and grant Transportes the right of first publication of the manuscript, without any financial charge, and waive any other remuneration for its publication by ANPET.
- Upon publication by Transportes, the manuscript is automatically licensed under the Creative Commons License CC BY 4.0 license. This license permits the work to be shared with proper attribution to the authors and its original publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the manuscript published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal, provided that such a contract does not imply an endorsement of the content of the manuscript or the new medium by ANPET.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) after the editorial process is complete. As Transportes provides open access to all published issues, authors are encouraged to use links to the DOI of their article in these cases.
- Authors guarantee that they have obtained the necessary authorization from their employers for the transfer of rights under this agreement, if these employers hold any copyright over the manuscript. Additionally, authors assume all responsibility for any copyright infringements by these employers, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
- Authors assume full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the necessary and appropriate authorizations for the disclosure of collected data and obtained results, releasing ANPET and Transportes from any responsibility in this regard.
